beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 9,000,000 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from March 28, 2011 to January 28, 2015; and (b) the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. (1) Around March 28, 2011, the Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant and had the Defendant build sn beamline with Nonparty D, etc. at the site of the construction of Class II neighborhood living facilities located outside C and two parcels of the Defendant’s construction work at Ansan-si.
At the time of the sn beam assembly, the plaintiff was sitting above the sn beam beam line, and was crashed, and suffered injuries, such as a sniffrout sniffrout siffrout of the right bridge, sniffrout siffrout in the sniffrout siffrout of the right bridge, siffrout ground, siffrout ground, right siffrout ground, siffrout of the right siffrout, and the left siffrout, siffrout, siffrout, siffrout, siffrout of the right siffrg, and the right siffrout ground.
(2) In general, in order to install a sn beam line after removing concrete from the construction site of a building, the sn beam assembly with the sn beam line, such as the tegroid, should be conducted, but the sn beam assembly with the sn beam line should not be conducted in the above accident site. However, the safety equipment, such as the sn beam, was not provided in itself.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2-1, Gap evidence 2-2, Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 7-1 and 7-2, witness D's testimony and purport of whole pleadings
B. According to the facts of recognition of liability, the defendant neglected his duty of care to provide physical facilities for the prevention of fall, such as the accusation work unit, so that the plaintiff, an employee, as the plaintiff's employer, may work safely in dangerous work, such as the sn beam beam installation. The accident of this case occurred by the defendant's negligence.
Therefore, the defendant is responsible for compensating the plaintiff for damages caused by the accident of this case.
(c) limitation of liability, provided that the sn beamline as the plaintiff also has been installed.