Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 28, 2017, the Defendant visited the public service center of the Gu-U.S. police station located in 11-4, Dong-dong, Dong-si, Gu-si, Si-si, and submitted a false complaint to the police officer who is unable to identify his name.
The complaint is "C on April 18, 2017, and around 23:00 on April 18, 2017, the complainant has been injured by plucking and plucking up two weeks of arms in order to cut off the cell phone of the complainant, and "I shall write down the flab," and "I shall write down the flab without death."
“Intimidating the complainant as “,” and allowing the complainant to unfold a mobile phone lock-freeton.
The content or fact C was that there was no coercion or injury to the defendant.
Nevertheless, the defendant submitted a written complaint as above, and around July 2, 2017, the defendant made a statement of the same damage at the old police station type and the defendant 1 team office.
In this respect, the defendant made a false accusation for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment.
Summary of Evidence
1. The legal statement of the witness C;
1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;
1. Statement made by the police against the defendant;
1. Complaint;
1. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this Court as to the attachment of a criminal suspect C’s on-site recording files and recording records of the instant case submitted by the criminal suspect C, C does not appear to have threatened or injured the criminal defendant as stated in the instant complaint, and it can be sufficiently recognized that the criminal defendant was not guilty of C as stated in its reasoning.
1. C From an investigative agency to this court, “Any assault, such as plucking or plucking, etc. of the defendant’s arms or any other person, or any person who does not kill the defendant without so shall be discarded.
There is no proof of intimidation.
“A consistent statement is made to the effect that it is “.”
② According to the recording of the scene at the time of the instant case, C at the time of the instant case, the Defendant at the time of the instant case, “Fashton, unfashed, and killed.”
The victim’s cell phone pattern, such as speaking, shall be unfolded.