The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant was dissatisfed due to the misunderstanding of facts at the time of the instant case, and the Defendant’s hand her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Nevertheless, the court below convicted the defendant of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts (in particular, the police statement of the victim D), the facts that the defendant followed the victim in front of the Ccafeteria located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 12:30 on September 21, 2010, and the victim resisted the victim's her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her, but the defendant denied the defendant her her her her her her her her her.

Therefore, in the same purport, the defendant is convicted of the facts charged in this case.