The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In relation to the misunderstanding of the facts or the misapprehension of the legal doctrine, the Defendant only has a mother and child used by the victim, but did not have the victim’s head.

In relation to the point of injury, the defendant did not contain the chest of the victim, and the part and degree of the victim's injury do not coincide with the cause or circumstance of the injury initially alleged by the victim, so the act of the defendant and the injury in this case are not related to the person.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted all of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by misapprehending the legal principles.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (1.5 million won) is too heavy.

2. Determination

A. 1) In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court as to the charge of assaulting the facts or misapprehension of the legal doctrine, the Defendant may be admitted the facts of assaulting the victim as stated in this part of the facts charged.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's and defense counsel's assertion is without merit.

(1) The injured party consistently from an investigative agency to the court of original trial, “The day he tried to remove miscellaneously on dry field, which the Defendant had followed his will.

The Defendant, in front of his own initiative, made a concrete statement on the damage situations by stating that “I am sphere and sphere, I am sphere and sphere, I do not am sphere and sphere. I am sphere. I am sphere, and I am sphere. I do not have any motive or circumstance to make a false statement against the Defendant.” There is no other motive or circumstance to make a false statement against the Defendant.

(2) The Defendant was suspected of having the winded with her husband at an investigative agency to bring a victim again once again, and was drinking so far.