Text
1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.
1. The following facts of recognition are not disputed between the parties, or may be acknowledged by adding up the whole purport of the pleadings to each entry in Gap evidence 1 and 2:
The Plaintiff is a merchant engaged in the manufacturing business of lighting fixtures with the trade name of “B,” and the Defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling lighting fixtures and ELE-Gu.
B. The Plaintiff from February 14, 2015 to the same year
4. Before February, 400, the Defendant supplied 4,400 won per dog (including value-added tax) to the Defendant, ELD lighting, etc., and received a total of KRW 35,820,000 from the Defendant.
C. On May 7, 2015, the Plaintiff sent a content-certified mail demanding the Defendant to pay the unpaid goods up to the 13th day of the same year and received it by the Defendant around that time.
2. The parties' assertion
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion from February 14, 2015 to the same year
4. 2. up to 2.0, ELD lighting, which was supplied to the Defendant, is a total of 12,415.
The defendant on March 13, 2015, and the same year
5.9.1,266 totals 1,348 on the ground of product defects.
2) Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the same amount as the purport of the claim in the principal claim as the remainder of the goods. (B) The Defendant’s assertion 1) did not receive the delivery of the Plaintiff’s 1,746 total sum of 1,746 of the following: (i) 360 of February 16, 2015; (ii) 27. 656 of the same month; (iii) 130 of March 2, 2015; and (iv) 1,746 of the same month among the details that
In addition, the defendant, among goods supplied by the plaintiff, on March 13, 2015, 82 living room stabilizers on March 13, 2015, and the same year.
5.9. 25w air conditioners 1,294 and 172 air conditioners were returned on the ground of defects in the product, and 25w air conditioners 543 air conditioners, such as air conditioners, are in custody at present for the return of the product, due to defects in the product.
Therefore, the defendant is finally 8,578 ELD lighting supplied by the plaintiff, and the remaining goods price obligations amounting to KRW 1,923,200.