1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

A. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding the instant case is examined as stated in paragraph (2), and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of Paragraph (3) to the judgment of the Plaintiff’s assertion at the court of first instance as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Parts to be dried;

A. The second sentence No. 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: “* 20,000,000 won for cancer diagnosis benefit (2,00,000 won for the species of boundary).”

B. On the 6th of the judgment of the court of first instance, the 6th of the 15th of the 15th of the 6th of the 15th of the 196th of the 15th of the

C. Nos. 6 and 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be followed as follows.

(C) According to the theory of lawsuit, the defendant's total amount of KRW 3,400,00 insurance money (=1,00,000 per annum from the date following the first instance court's decision that it is reasonable to dispute over the existence or scope of the obligation to pay insurance money from August 30, 2013 to December 22, 2015; KRW 400,000 per annum from the day after the day when the first instance court's decision that it is reasonable to determine that the defendant's obligation to pay insurance money exists to the plaintiff; KRW 1,40,000 per annum from the day when the first instance court's decision was rendered to the day when the duty to pay insurance money is paid; KRW 50,000 per annum from the day after the day when the first instance court's decision was made to the day when the duty to pay insurance money is fully paid; KRW 200,000 per annum from the day when the duty to pay insurance money is paid; KRW 150% per annum from the day after the day when the duty to pay.