The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around August 3, 2017, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) between the Victim E (Inn, 69 years of age) and B B lending C Dong and D Dong on August 3, 2017; and (c) the Defendant’s leakage and waste disposal problems of the Victim E (Inn, f9 years of age) were brought about; (d) the Defendant was faced by the Victim, with a double hand, pushed the Victim’s shoulder toward the wall; and (e) continued to go beyond the cement floor by pushing the Victim who was driven by the Defendant to the front of the Fhohead.

Ultimately, the Defendant abused the victim as above and suffered injury, such as a cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cages, etc. for the victim.

2. As evidence corresponding to the facts charged, there are statements in the police and court of E, statements in G police, and statements in the injury diagnosis report, etc.

However, in full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it is difficult to believe the E’s statement as it is and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(1) First, we regard the part that the defendant was pushed ahead of E in the apartment wall.

G The police has caused the defendant to face with the apartment wall by pushing the E.

was stated.

However, G made a statement in this court to the effect that “E faces with walls in the course of physical fighting by tanging Defendant, Defendant, and E, etc. in a narrow space rather than being sealed by Defendant, Defendant, and others.”

Unlike others, the defendant intentionally faced with the wall by intentionally pushing the shoulder of E.

There is no evidence to see.

(2) Next, we examine the part that the defendant left E before the inspection officer.

G made a statement to the effect that there were many residents at the time of fighting, and that the defendant was at the time or did not go beyond E.

He, who is another witness, also in the police, may see E in the police.