A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was an employee from January 1, 2012 to July 2013, 201, who was working as a “D” operated by the victim C in Goyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu.

At around 13:09 on June 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened the entrance of the storage of goods in D using the keys possessed at the time of the said distribution; and (b) intruded into the storage, thereby putting three water shoots equivalent to KRW 90,000 in the market price of the victim’s own E-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-S-W-W-W-S-W-S-W-S-S-

2. On July 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) intruded into a storage of D goods, such as paragraph (1) on July 20, 2014; (b) and (c) took four stuffs equivalent to KRW 180,00 in the market price of the victim C, which is the victim C, into a vehicle of his/her own hurf and stolen it.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd a structure at night and stolen another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for resumes, copies and investigation reports;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, each of the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 330 of the Criminal Act, and Article 330 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is that the defendant led to a confession and reflects the crime, the amount of damage in this case is difficult to be deemed to be significant, and the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind of crime, and intruded the warehouse without permission over several times in favor of the defendant, thereby reducing the theft act, and there is no situation in which the defendant has made efforts to recover the damage so far.