logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.01.21 2013고단3540
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to complete payment even if the Defendant borrowed money from the Victim D;

1. On January 13, 2012, at the F office operated by the victim under subparagraph 302 of the building in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the victim made a false statement to the effect that he/she would be able to repay money to the victim because he/she can do so because he/she can do so because he/she would be able to settle the performance rates that he/she has received in advance from the former workplace. It received 5,000,000 won from the victim, namely, in cash, from the victim’s seat, and remitted 12,00,000 won to the account of the Defendant’

2. Around January 31, 2012, the F Office made a false statement to the effect that if it lends money to the victim at the F Office, it would purchase samples and return them later if the contract is not sexually formed, it would then be returned later. It received from the victim the amount of KRW 800,000 from the Defendant’s bank account under the name of the said Defendant for the purpose of borrowing money, i.e., receiving KRW 500,000 from the victim on February 3, 2012, around March 23, 2012, KRW 1,000,000 from March 23, 2012, and KRW 60,000 to the said account on April 19, 2012, and receives KRW 2,90,000 from the said account four times in total;

3. On April 30, 2012, the victim at the F Office made a false statement to the effect that, even if there is no actual fact that the fact is the victim, and even if there is no fact that the fact is H, she would lend money to the F Office, she would lend money for the contractual intent, she would receive 5,000,000 won from the victim, i.e., from the victim to the said Enterprise Bank Account as the borrowed money;

4. On May 23, 2012, a false statement is made to the effect that the F Office will lend money necessary for the business to the victim. It receives from the victim i.e., a transfer of KRW 2,00,000 from the said corporate bank account for the purpose of borrowing money;

5. Around June 15, 2012, the F Office made a false statement to the effect that it is impossible to repay money to the victim because it is not able to do business because it borrowed money from the bond company. It is the Defendant’s wife from the victim, i.e., the money borrowed from the victim.

arrow