Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Criminal facts

1. In around 03:30 on August 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) expressed a bath to D who operates a singing point due to the drinking value problem; (b) was urged by the police officer F to return home from the victim of the E box called upon D upon receipt of the D’s report; (c) the said D and the employees G of the singing shop to be kept by the police officer; and (d) was determined by the Defendant at a large interest at the bar; (c) the Defendant was able to have the victim of the E box called upon upon receipt of the D’s report; and (d) the Defendant was able to have the victim of the said D and the said D and the employees G of the singing shop.

The victim openly insultingd the victim through the brusation, such as the Cresh, etc.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, as seen above, became a police box in Kimhae-si in order to undergo an investigation as a charge of insulting the police officer.

On August 12, 2017, the Defendant, at around 03:40 on August 12, 2017, took a bath to F police officer before the police box, and received a warning from F to the police officer assigned to the above police box that he could be found as a crime of interference with the performance of official duties, and used F to take a bath for the above police officer, and assaulted F with F’s bather bat.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of laws and regulations on police statements made to D, G, and F;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the said Act (to the extent that the aggregate of the amounts of each of the above crimes is aggregated);

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which is the first offender, was divided in depth into and against his mistake, and the motive, means and result of the instant crime, circumstances after the crime, Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, intelligence, environment, etc., were comprehensively taken into account, and the sentence like the order was determined.