A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 11, 2012, the Defendant drafted a false complaint with respect to D, E, F, G, and H at the Non-Office C in Jeju.

On September 19, 201, the complaint states that "the defendant's complainants forged the minutes as if they were held at the general meeting of shareholders and the board of directors using seals of the complainants although they did not consent to the appointment of new directors and the resignation of the representative director of the complainants." On September 22, 2011, the Jeju District Court submitted the application form for change of the company and the relevant forged documents to the Seopopo Office for Registration of Change of the company, and submitted them to the Jeju District Court, and made them enter false registered matters in the corporate register."

However, in fact, the defendant agreed to resign from the office of representative director and to hold a general meeting and a meeting of the board of directors. Therefore, the defendant's filing of the minutes and the application for change of the registration of the corporation based on this was legitimate.

Nevertheless, on October 11, 2012, the defendant submitted the above complaint to the public service center of the Dong-dong Police Station in the Dong-dong Police Station. On October 25, 2012, the defendant prepared a statement of statement and filed it with D, E, F, G, and H without permission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of witness E;

1. Each statement made by witnesses G, D, H, and I in the third and fifth trial records;

1. Each police station and each prosecutor's office protocol against A;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act: The circumstances arise from the dispute over the management right of the company, such as the fact that there is no criminal record of the same kind and no criminal record of the suspension of execution of execution of imprisonment or heavier punishment: The reason why the motive for an accusation seems to have been the aspect of creating favorable results in civil cases, etc., taking into account the above circumstances, the age, character and behavior