logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.02.05 2012고단3421
무고
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 28, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspended sentence of three years and fine of three million won in June, 2013 by the Daejeon High Court on December 28, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 22, 2013.

On April 2, 2012, the Defendant drafted a false complaint against D, E, and F in the residence of the Defendant in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon.

The criminal complaint states that "after the defendant's complaint appeared and took an oath as a witness of the case of violation of the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver's License) by Daejeon District Court 201Kadan2378, which is the first trial of the defendant's non-licensed driving case by the complainant, the Daejeon District Court 201Kadan2378. The defendant testified that "if the complainant did not witness the car in the G Belgium, he would punish him." In the supplementary statement of the complainant, "the person operating the car in the above Belgium was the wife of the complainant." While driving the car in the above Belgium, the complainant did not have changed the H and the position while driving the car in the above Belgium, the defendant D, E, and F appeared as the witness in the above Belgium case, and the complainant testified the above Belgium and testified to the witness that he had changed the H and the post immediately after the enforcement of the car in the Belgium, and made a false testimony."

However, in fact, the defendant was driving the Belgium car without a driver's license, and the police officer D and E dispatched by the F's report confirming the driving without a driver's license, and the police officer and reporting person testified false information to the effect that the police officer and reporting person testified in order not to be punished despite the fact that the site was directly discovered, and the defendant made a supplementary statement as above at the time of preparing the statement by the complainant.

On April 5, 2012, the defendant submitted the above complaint to the prosecutor's office employees whose name is not known to the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor's Office's civil petition office, and made a statement to the complainant, and made the above D, E, and F.

arrow