A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 23, 2017, the Defendant operated "C" 601 in Osan-si B building, and received 100,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from a male guest who was found in Cmast business around 22:50 on May 23, 2017, and had female employees D (V, 54 years of age) do the act of similarity with "Handbbling" in order to look at the sexual organ of male guest.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Application of business registration certificate, photographs, field detection photographs and statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution are as follows: (a) comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances; (b) the Defendant’s age, family relation, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime; (c) means and method of the crime; and (d) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence is to be imposed as ordered.

[The favorable circumstances] The Defendant acknowledged his mistake while leading to the confession of the instant crime; the Defendant’s period of business as a broker of sexual traffic is relatively short; and the Defendant’s profits derived therefrom are not significant.

The defendant appears to have no record of criminal punishment in excess of the fine.

(1) The crime of this case is an employee who is not recognized as a massageman's qualification in the course of operating a marina business for profit by allowing the defendant to engage in a similar act by guiding male customers to female employees while operating a marina business. The crime of this case is a business of arranging sexual traffic, and its nature is not good. The act of arranging sexual traffic is a business of arranging sexual traffic. The act of arranging sexual traffic by the defendant is a woman's sex, impairing a sound sexual culture and good morals, and is not a significant social harm.