beta
Text
Defendant
B The Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and a fine of 1,50,000 won.
The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant B, upon the judgment of the Association affiliated with the D Association, was a person in charge of the business of determining the games designated in accordance with the schedule of a certain game, and in the case of the E competition compared with other Gu items, the judgment of the trial has an absolute influence on the success and failure, and there was a duty of fair and neutral inquiry in accordance with the rules of the E competition and the regulations of the E competition.
Nevertheless, the Defendants were willing to receive money and valuables in the name of “food service expenses”, “booming expenses”, “satisfing money”, “fat money”, and “fat money”, which are provided before and after a combination to the effect that convenience in the adjudication is reached, such as making a decision more favorable than the other team in a situation where it is unclear whether the Defendants are contrary to the regulations in the E market from the elementary, middle, and high schools, universities, and instructors of unemployment teams across the country where the D Association participated in the E games.
On April 14, 2011, the Defendant participated in the 2011 International Games (from April 6, 2011 to April 14, 2011) from H, the supervisor of the department E in the G Middle School in Scheon-siF, and received KRW 400,000,00 from the above date and time to June 1, 2012, under the same name as the Defendant’s bank account, for the same purpose as 11 times from the total nine E leaders, under the circumstances where it is unclear whether it is a Ban in the E conference in the supervision of the Association in which the G Middle School E participate in the future.
As a result, the defendant acquired 4,200,000 won in return for an illegal solicitation in relation to his duties as a E-Appellant belonging to the D Association.
2. Defendant A was in an unstable position with E team leaders participating in the E Games supervised by the D Association every year, according to the results of the E Team, and there was a need to pay a good grade in Ecom, and Ecom is different.