logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.08.22 2019고단2016
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From June 2018 to February 20, 2019, Defendant A operated “D”, which is a commercial sex business establishment, on the building Songpa-gu Seoul and the third floor of Songpa-gu Seoul, and the third floor.

On February 20, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.), along with B employed as the head of the office on February 16, 2019, the Defendant provided the said customer and sexual intercourse with the said employee on the condition that he received 220,000 won from the customer E who promised to run the Internet entertainment site advertisements and gave half of the amount of sexual traffic. From June 2018 to February 20, 2019 (B from February 1, 2019 to February 20, 2019), the Defendant provided the said employee with the sex trafficking workers of Thailand’s nationality.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with B to arrange commercial sex acts.

(b) Where a foreigner violating the Immigration Control Act intends to find a job in the Republic of Korea, he/she shall obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and no person shall employ any person who has no status

Nevertheless, around February 20, 2019, the Defendant employed the F, G, H, and I of the Thailand’s nationality who did not obtain the status of stay eligible for employment in the Republic of Korea as an employee of sexual traffic in the said business place, and employed J as an employee of the said business place.

(c) No person who violates the Telecommunications Business Act shall use telecommunications services provided to a mobile communications terminal in the name of another person, on condition that it provides funds;

Nevertheless, around January 2019, the Defendant paid KRW 180,00 to the person who was unaware of the name known through the above “D” site, and purchased the core chip, which is opened in the name of L, attached it to the mobile phone terminal, and used it as a mobile phone (M) for the business of sexual traffic establishments.

2. Defendant B from February 1, 2019 to February 20, 2019.

arrow