logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.07.26 2013고단1085
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall engage in business of exchanging or arranging the exchange of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products, and shall provide game products with contents different from the contents of the rating for the distribution or use thereof.

On June 27, 2008, from around August 13, 2008 to around August 13, 2008, the Defendant operated the FF Game in E. The “Sky St. St.” was a game product that obtained free gifts from the Game Rating Board to the user’s ability. However, the game products offered by the Defendant for use were modified so that the result of the game can be determined by an incidental method, regardless of the user’s ability, because there was an inherent probability in the game differently from the contents deliberated.

In addition, upon the request of the defendant, G made a business registration of H in the name of her mother, and upon the request of the defendant, G made it possible for her mother to exchange money with the defendant, and K operated a money exchange center in such a manner that customers exchange premiums acquired through the use of game products in cash at the money exchange center, and the money exchange center was made 4,500 won per money through the money exchange station operated by the defendant through the use of the money exchange box operated by the defendant.

As a result, in collusion with G, J, and K, the Defendant provided game products with contents different from those rated by the Game Rating Board, and operated a business of exchanging or arranging exchange of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against G and J;

1. Seizure records;

1. An appraiser;

1. Juvenile game providing business operators;

arrow