1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

judgment of the first instance.

1. The basic facts of the claim (1) : (a) the establishment process of G G, Inc. 1); (b) the Plaintiff, who was conducting crypting in the Seoul I market, had the manufacturing technology of automobile parts, such as heat treatment, as the Plaintiff was engaged in the manufacturing industry of automobile parts, around around 1995.

) Nonparty G Co., Ltd. (Plaintiff, F, and B) operating the business of manufacturing motor vehicle parts and the name of the Company G, namely, K.

hereinafter referred to as “G” only

(2) G was established on September 23, 1995, and 10,000 shares (the total amount of capital was KRW 50,000 per share) were issued at the time of its establishment, and the shares were acquired as listed below.

(3) At the time of the establishment, the Plaintiff registered as the representative director of G, Nonparty F, and Defendant B respectively. The number of shares owned by the Plaintiff Nos. 14,000 and 40% 60% of the number of shares owned by Nonparty H (the Plaintiff’s spouse) 600,300 30% of Defendant D (the de facto spouse of F) 300,300 30% of Defendant C (F’s son’s spouse) 300 30% of 300,50 50 50% of Defendant E (Defendant B’s spouse) 300,300 30,000 10,000 10,000 70 m20,000 m27 m2, 160,000 m2, m206 m2, m25,000 m2, m360,000 m2.

(No specific material exists to ascertain where the above real estate purchase price was salted. 2 G on December 12, 1995, the construction cost of the factory building to S Co., Ltd. is KRW 198 million.