beta
Text
1. Defendant A
(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;
(b)Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendants’ co-principal
A. On August 15, 2012, Defendant A, who is engaged in a non-registered credit business, proposed to provide the above credit business from the first patrolman on October 2012, 2012, by requesting Defendant B to help and help the Defendant B while running the credit business from August 15, 2012, including lending KRW 2,00,000 on condition that D would be repaid in 40,000, including the principal and interest of the 60-day day from the north-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (Seoul Metropolitan City), including the principal and interest of the 60-day day.
Defendant
A from August 15, 2012 to August 12, 2013, at Daegu, Gyeongnam-do, and Gyeongbuk-do, a total of KRW 362,310,000 on a total of 126 occasions, such as the statement in the list of crimes, from around 15, 2012 to around 12, and Defendant B, from around 12, 2012 to around 12, Defendant B, as described in Table 2 of the list of crimes, directly collected money from persons leased by Defendant A from Japan, such as Ho-si, Gyeong-do, Mancheon-do, Yangcheon-gun, Yangyang-do, and Gyeongbuk-do, Gyeongbuk-do.
Accordingly, from August 15, 2012, Defendant A had engaged in credit business in collusion with Defendant A from the beginning of October 2012, and Defendant B had engaged in credit business without registering the credit business until August 12, 2013.
나. 대부업광고 관련 피고인 A는 대부업등록을 하지 아니한 채, 제1항 기재와 같이 대부업을 하면서 범죄일람표 1 기재 지역 일대에서 “3개월 쓸 급한 돈!! 쉽게 대출 안되나 ” 등이 인쇄된 명함형 전단지 등을 배포하며 대부업 광고를 하던 중 2012. 12.경 피고인 B에게 도와달라고 부탁하여 2012. 12.경부터 위와 같은 대부업 광고를 같이 하기로 공모하였다.
Defendant
A from August 15, 2012 to August 12, 2013, at Daegu, Gyeongnam-do, and Gyeongbuk-do, distribution of the above name-type leaflet through several times, and Defendant B distributed the above name-type leaflet through several times from December 2012 to February 2013, 200.
Accordingly, Defendant A is the defendant.