A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On May 2, 2008, the Defendant is a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act by issuing a summary order of a fine of 500,000 won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Eastern District Court on May 2, 2008, and a fine of 2.5 million won for the same crime at the Incheon District Court on June 2, 2009.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around 02:50 on November 1, 2017, the Defendant driving the B vehicle at approximately 15-20 meters while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.170% in blood on the roads in front of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon.

2. From around 04:05 on November 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) voluntarily accompanying the parked vehicle at the D office of the Incheon Southern-dong Police Station D office located in Incheon Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, as described in paragraph (1); (b) voluntarily accompanying the police officer to measure drinking and returning to his/her country; (c) the police officer, who gets out of the public service center and returned to the country; (d) the police officer, who gets out of the public service center, refused returning to his/her country and returned to the public service center; and (e) the police officer, who gets back to the public service center, gets 50,000 won of the repair cost in his/her opening.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

3. Around November 04:10, 2017, at the office of the Incheon Southern Police Station D located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (a) talked that the Defendant would have returned home after a drinking test; (b) however, without any justifiable reason, he saw off the horse E belonging to the Namdong Police Station D, and spited spite, through two times the Defendant’s right shoulder, with the Defendant’s right shoulder, and spits off and pushed off the above E’s left shoulder, and attempted to take back the chest and left hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic accident handling cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver at home and report on the detection of the driver at home;

1. A person to whom the case is to be raised;