logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.10.18 2017고단5509
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 22:00 on June 12, 2017 to around 22:45 of the same day, the Defendant driven a B-hand car with alcohol concentration of about 0.141% in the section of approximately 35 km from the road located in the Dong-dong loan limit of the members of Ansan-si, Incheon Metropolitan City, to the road located in the Dong-dong loan limit of the members of Ansan-si, Seoul Metropolitan Government.

2. On June 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at around 22:50 on June 12, 2017, the Defendant: (b) provided four persons, such as D, etc., belonging to the police box C of the Incheon Southern Police Station C, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112, requested the Defendant to measure alcohol; and (c) the measurement value of drinking, such as paragraph (1), was the same as that of paragraph (1); and (d) the Defendant refused to request the police officer to prepare and sign a written notice of revocation of a driver’s license for drinking; and (b) refused to receive the said written notice.

§ 30,000,00

Does there be no difference between them;

By stating that the police officers “to spread within the Southern East Police Station and the South East-dong Police Station,” they prevented the patrol vehicle from leaving the patrol vehicle behind another person, and threaten the brue F of the brue with the seat open for the patrol vehicle, and threaten the brue F of the brue with the hand, as D goes back to the house, D’s breast part of the brue was forced to go to D.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the detection and the statement of the circumstances of the driver involved;

1. Driving under the relevant legal provision on criminal facts: Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that obstructs the performance of official duties: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of official duties in the judgment);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 Section 1 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.

arrow