logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.04.12 2016나608
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding "a statement to the effect that, in order to plant trees and other facilities on the road of this case, use them must be approved in advance from Seopopopopo City in accordance with the State Property Act" to the effect that M, who was in charge of the implementation and approval of Driju Development Project, as public officials belonging to the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province tourism industry and its affiliated public officials, has not permitted the Plaintiff to plant cage trees, which are shielding facilities of this case, to the road of this case."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow