Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 14, 2016, at around 00:42, the Defendant received a report from “C danran” located in “C Garan-si B,” and received a notification from 112 on the business principle that “not to be a drunk customer,” and took protective measures by victim slope E (41 tax) belonging to the D District Unit of the Seopo-si Police Station, and accompanied the Defendant to the 112 patrol vehicle and to the district.

At around 01:10 on the same day, the Defendant got drunk before the seat of the victim who was next to the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat, without any special reason, while drunking to the seat of the seat of the seat and moving to the office.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning protective measures by police officials, and at the same time, injured the victim such as an open prize room requiring two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on investigation (Submission of a medical certificate);

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to attach CCTV images CDs and photographs at the time of the instant case);

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant assaulted a police officer’s face in the course of performing official duties to interfere with the performance of official duties, and at the same time committed the instant crime by inflicting bodily injury on the victimized police officer, and the nature of such crime is very poor, and there is a need to strictly punish the Defendant with regard to the instant crime against public authority, such as interference with the establishment of national legal order and the eradication of the light of public authority.

However, the defendant is making a confession of the crime of this case, the degree of injury suffered by the victimized police officer cannot be seen as serious, and the defendant was punished by a fine only once for the crime of this case.