(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.04.30 2013노1862

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.04.30 2013노1862

사기

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. In light of the following: (a) the summary of the grounds for appeal revealed that C made a confession to the Defendant at the site immediately after the occurrence of fraud; (b) the Defendant conspireds with the Defendant at the site; (c) the Defendant’s attitude at the time of detection, allocation of actual action; (d) the Defendant’s statement consistent with respect to profit distribution after the commission of the crime; and (e) the Defendant’s commission of the crime, upon the occurrence of the Defendant’s commission of the crime, the Defendant’s statement is reliable; (c) the Defendant provided the escape fund to C; and (d) the Defendant provided the escape fund to C; and (e) the Defendant provided the escape fund to the creditors in the trial process of the lower court; and (e) the circumstances leading up to the detection of the fraud of the instant case; (e) the Defendant’s attitude at the time of detection; and (e) the circumstances leading up to the escape and arrest of C; and (e) the facts charged of the instant fraud that the Defendant conspired with C and attempted to commit fraud.

Nevertheless, the court below rendered a not-guilty verdict on the facts charged of this case on the basis of the recording of the defendant's submission without credibility and part of C's statement. Thus, there is an error of law affecting the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding facts.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant, along with C, conspired with C to acquire another person’s property by using a one-name “sene card” indicated on the back of the card and a special siren that can see it.

The Defendant and C, from January 31, 2012 to January 19:30, 2012, were ponding to the victim F and G in E-pention operated by the Defendant’s female her female her female her female her female her female her female her female her female her female, and the Defendant and C were her female her female her female her female her female her female her female her female her female her female with the Defendant’s family her female her female her female her female her female her female her female her female her family

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2013.08.09 2012고단1495

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.05.01 2015고단145

-울산지방법원 2014.08.29 2014고단1835

-울산지방법원 2019.07.04 2019노172

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.01.10 2018고단1760