The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. If there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions in the pleadings of this case, including: (a) there is no change of circumstances to consider the sentencing after the judgment of the court below; (b) there is no reason to consider the sentencing after the judgment of the court; (c) the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a year and six months; and (d) the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a crime such as in the form of in-house imprisonment with prison labor; and (d) the defendant was repeatedly discharged from prison in the form of one month and two months; and (c) the victim was not injured until now; and (d) the defendant was not injured until now, the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable even if considering the circumstance that the defendant appeared to reflect

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.