The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the facts that the defendant caused the crime of this case to be committed for basic livelihood and some of the circumstances leading up to the crime are to be taken into account; the court below deposited the damaged amount; the victim stated that he does not want the punishment of the defendant; the victim recognized the crime of this case and stated that he will not repeat the crime of this case in good faith in the future without reoffending; but the defendant was sentenced on February 13, 2014 to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime and for six months; and the defendant was released from the above punishment for the same crime of this case on two occasions in two weeks; the defendant committed each crime of this case on two occasions in the same way as before the repeated crime period; the court below sentenced the punishment by taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant; the sentencing of the same similar case; the fairness with the sentencing of the same kind of crime; the motive and circumstances leading up to the crime of this case; the defendant's age after the crime of this case; and the records and arguments of this case are too unfair.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.