logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.03.29 2016고단7735
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who intends to run the business of providing juvenile games or the business of providing Internet computer game facilities for committing crimes from June 1, 2016 to September 26, 2016 shall be equipped with facilities prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism and shall register with the competent authority.

Nevertheless, from June 1, 2016 to September 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) installed one set of “Co-office” game machine (class classification number:CC-N-120808-018) without being registered with the competent authority; and (b) provided the said game machine to many and unspecified persons.

Accordingly, the defendant did not register with the competent authorities and run the juvenile game providing business.

2. A person who intends to run the business of providing juvenile games or the business of providing Internet computer game facilities for committing crimes from November 14, 2016 to November 17, 2016 shall be equipped with facilities prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism and shall register with the competent authority.

Nevertheless, in front of the mutual convenience point of “E” located in D from November 14, 2016 to November 17, 2016, the Defendant, without being registered with the competent authority, provided one game machine for “cat-house” (class classification number:CC-N-1208-018) and one pop-up game machine for “pop-up” (class classification number: classification number: CC-N-160324-021) to many and unspecified persons without being registered with the competent authority.

Accordingly, the defendant did not register with the competent authorities and run the juvenile game providing business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Determination of classification of “cop-up shop”, classification of “pop-up pop-up” game product classification, and determination of classification of “pop-up pop-up” classification;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the scene of regulation, photographing photographs, and field photographs of regulation;

1. Article 45 of the relevant Act on criminal facts and Article 45 of the Selection of Punishment and Promotion of Game Industry Act;

arrow