Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months for the crime of Category A 1 and for the crime of Category 1 (b) of the ruling.

Punishment of the crime

On August 27, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 4 months of imprisonment for fraud in the Daejeon District Court Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on September 4, 2010 and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 4, 2010.

Defendant

B On September 6, 2012, a person who was sentenced to two years of probation on imprisonment with prison labor in the Daejeon District Court on September 6, 2012 and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 14, 2012.

Defendant

D On November 10, 2010, as a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. (joint assault) in the Mancheon Branch of the Gwangju District Court on the punishment of violence, etc. (joint assault) was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months and the decision on November 18, 2010 became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant, on September 2009, lent gambling funds to the Victim K within the passenger car volume in the middle of the 1st century located in Hasan-si in the Hamsan-si. However, whether the Defendant would remove and take money from the Defendant, who did not change it;

Does it be the same as that of the feed;

It is not any way to create human illness, but it is the same that nishe can remove and drink money from the floor of the rice industry.

“Around October 1, 2009, the victim was frighten as if the victim were to be retaliationed with money, and the victim was frightened with a loan of KRW 80 million to the victim’s house as security at the credit cooperative granted on October 1, 2009, and granted KRW 36 million to the defendant from the next side of the new union located in the Chungcheong-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

Accordingly, the defendant received property by threatening the victim.

B. On December 16, 2014, with respect to a case in which the Defendant filed a complaint with the relevant police station for gambling the victim L L, the instant case, etc. outside of the instant case, the Defendant made a false statement by phoneing the victim to the victim “to allow the defrauded to voluntarily surrenders himself/herself and become a fraudulent case. To do so, the Defendant made a false statement to the extent that the expenses need to be borne by himself/herself.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he/she wishes to use the money for the necessary expenses to surrender the accused.