Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant with the trade name of “C” in Seo-gu Daejeon.

No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall place a false mark of origin, or place a mark likely to cause confusion as such.

Nevertheless, from August 27, 2013 to February 7, 2014, the Defendant: (a) prepared 140.36 km of Australia’s beef c with domestic raw milk, and sold KRW 7,000 to 281 for a portion of 1 person after cooking 140.36 km of Australia’s beef c in Korea; (b) indicated “10,000 won” at the entrance of the restaurant, and indicated the origin of agricultural and fishery products as “fluorium 10,00” at the entrance of the restaurant, and indicated the origin of agricultural and fishery products as “fluorium 10,00” at the entrance of the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each statute to the details of detection and photographs;

1. Article 15 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant does not have the same criminal record, confession and reflect in depth.

Also, it seems that there is no risk of re-offending by changing the origin labeling after the crime.

In this context, the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime are considered, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.