beta
Text
1. Defendant C’s KRW 10,000,000 and its amount shall be 5% per annum from June 27, 2009 to February 12, 2014 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The following facts may be acknowledged, either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the statements and images of Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence 13, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 16, Eul evidence 21 and 22 (including each number), and the whole purport of the arguments as a result of the inspection by this court.
The Defendants were indicted for abuse of official authority and obstruction of another’s exercise of rights, and arrest of abuse of official authority as follows; Defendant C was convicted on February 6, 2013 by Suwon District Court 201Mo328, Suwon District Court 201Mo328, and Defendant C was pronounced not guilty (two years of suspended execution and suspension of qualifications for six months of imprisonment). Defendant C was appealed on the above judgment with Suwon District Court 2013No888; Defendant C appealed filed an appeal against the above judgment; the Prosecutor also filed an appeal against Defendant C only part of the judgment against Defendant C. The aforementioned acquittal judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
【Criminal Facts】
Defendant
The Defendant, as the combat police agency D 807 combat police units, was a person who was engaged in the arrest of the deaf in the field of occupation at the point of occupation in which both members of the branch offices of the Korean Metal Trade Union and carried out the duties of the arrest of the deaf. On June 26, 2009, the Defendant occupied the above company at the front of Pyeongtaek-gu Motor Vehicle Co., Ltd. on the 150-3 side of Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-dong, Pyeongtaek-si, 150-3 around Jun. 26, 2009, and 6 members (E, F, G, H, I, and J) of the branch offices of both of the Korean Metal No.M. (E, H, H, I, I, and J) out of the above company, and the Defendant was arrested by 807 members of the said company, and was arrested by 807 members of the said company, but was first arrested by the EF, and immediately after the arrest of Ha, I, and six members were arrested.
The victim A (the plaintiff in this case; hereinafter the same shall apply) who is an attorney-at-law from the chairman of the bar labor group for a democratic society that arrives at the above site around that time, presents a lawyer identification card to the defendant and the full-time members.