logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.01.09 2013고단4198
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 29, 2013, at the front of the “D Game Site” located in Daejeon Pungdong-gu Daejeon on September 22 and 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the Defendant to the effect that he exchanged in the said game site; and (b) received a report from the Defendant to the effect that the Defendant would not properly control the victim F of the police officer F of the Daejeon Police Station E District called the Daejeon Police Station E zone called “F of the Daejeon Police Station E zone called the said game site business owner and the neighboring residents, etc.; and (c) made a public insult of the victim by saying, “I would like to have reported the amusement room to the victim and would not arrest the employees of the entertainment room; and (d) how I would know how I would know how I want this bit son; and (e) how I would have bit bit son.”

2. Definite and obstruction of performance of official duties on the same day at around 23:22, the Defendant: (a) held five police officers and civil petitioners in the Daejeon District E District of the Daejeon Pream Station located in the Daejeon Pungdong-gu, and (b) held that the said F was unable to be promoted to the Republic of Korea only, she was infinite, she was infinite, she was infinite, she was infinite, she was not promoted to the Republic of Korea, she was infinite, she was infinite, she was infinite, she was infinite, she was infinite, she was unable to be promoted to the Republic of Korea, she was infinite, she was infinite, she was infinite, and she was a victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant insulting the publicF and obstructed the legitimate performance of duties of F in relation to investigation of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement-related Acts and subordinate statutes to F;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including partial consideration of the circumstances of the crime, minor consideration of the damage, and the absence of the same criminal record);

arrow