1. The Defendants jointly and severally pay KRW 1,440,000 to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3...

1. In full view of the purport of the entire arguments as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including branch numbers), the plaintiff extended loans to non-party corporation D with a guarantee limit of KRW 600,00,000 (annual interest rate of KRW 15,000), KRW 70,000,000 (annual interest rate of KRW 2,000,000,000, annual interest rate of KRW 15,000) on July 14, 2009, KRW 200,000,000, annual interest rate of KRW 15,000, KRW 200,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 816,000, KRW 164,016, and joint and several sureties as to loans extended on July 14, 209, KRW 16,016, KRW 2014, and KRW 16,2014,6.64, respectively.

According to the above facts, the defendants are jointly and severally obligated to pay to the plaintiff KRW 1,440,00,000 within the limit of guarantee amount among the principal and interest of the above loans.

2. The Defendants’ assertion as to the Defendants asserted that Non-Party D corporation repaid its obligations according to the repayment plan of the rehabilitation case No. 2010 Ma24, Busan District Court, but it is not possible to recognize this only with the statement of No. 1, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this differently.

Therefore, the defendants' assertion on this is without merit.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.