beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant C by a fine of 5,00,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the proprietor of the F Game Center in Seongdong-gu, Sungnam-gu, the proprietor of the F Game Center in Sungnam-gu, the manager of the store in which customers receive points from game products in cash, and the manager of the store in which the defendant C lends the name of the representative of the above game site to the defendant, and the manager in charge of exchange while managing G and H.
No one shall engage in the business of exchanging, arranging the exchange or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.
Nevertheless, from November 1, 201 to March 22, 2012, the control date from November 22, 2011, the Defendants conspired to offer ten game works of “Mabro 50,” “Mabro 5-100,000 (5-10,000),” which are “Mabro 15,000,000 (5-100,000),” which are “Mabro 15,000,0000 (12,000-20,000)” to customers who acquired the Sobro 1,000,000, and exchanged the above points obtained through the use of game works in cash.
(b) No person who provides game products with the contents different from those of the rating shall provide them for the distribution or use of game products with the contents different from those of the rating received from the Rating Board;
Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired with each other to open the card twice when there is no negligence of the said “alleyer” game, which is a game classified in the above game site during the above period, and opened the card twice, and provided 10 games, which are different from the contents of the rating, so that the service fee can be secured by accumulated 500 points on CREIT if the Dar’s Spanish is accumulated, and provided it to many and unspecified customers for use.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ legal statement
1. Second prosecutorial examination protocol against Defendant A;
1. Each part of the police interrogation protocol against Defendant B and C.