The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. A person who steals or embezzled money from the party funeral at the party funeral operated by C at the time of the appeal summary F;

In recognition, the defendant did not report false facts because he accused F, and even if the F is not recognized as a crime, the above act does not constitute a crime.

Even if the Defendant reported CCTV images taken on the face of F in which the money was used by F, and the F knew that F was stolen or embezzled, there was no awareness of the falsity.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person who operates E in the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and 5th floor together with ASEAN.

On November 18, 2016, the Defendant served as the employee of the above party hall at the general public service center of the Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor's Office, Dobong-gu Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor's Office, 747, Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor's Office.

A false complaint against F (hereinafter “instant complaint”) was filed.

The purport of the complaint is that “the defendant litigant voluntarily embezzled 8,000 won in cash in the G party-gu at around 4:25 minutes of the new wall around August 19, 2016.”

On November 29, 2016, the Defendant continued to make a statement at the Seoul Southern Police Station’s office, the Defendant made a statement to the complainants of the above accusation case, and the police officer in charge brought KRW 8,000 from E, and around August 19, 2016 to KRW 8,000 from E, and around August 15, 2016 to the police officer in charge.

8. During the 18th day of August, 198, 700 won was brought to 78,500 won, and the 78,500 won was brought to mind, making a false statement to the effect that “the punishment would be punished.”

However, in fact, the above F did not bring about the money of the defendant to the H who helps the Gu funeral work under the direction of the defendant, and entered the above money in the daily fee register and did not bring about the money of the defendant at will.

Accordingly, the defendant is F. F.