Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.
Nevertheless, when the Defendant was asked from B, who was aware of it, to rescue the stroke m, the Defendant was posted on November 5, 2018 at the office of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E on the same date on the same date as C and D around November 28, 2018.
The Defendant, from around that time to March 27, 2019, delivered ethyl 174 (a total of seven times as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes) to B by the said method.
Accordingly, the defendant accepted psychotropic drugs.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against C, B, or D;
1. Investigation reports (C and currency of a suspect - ethyl oxide sales related), photographs attached thereto, investigation reports (in relation to telephone numbers confirmed by dividing them into “F”), criminal investigation reports (G), conversations between a suspect C and “F” (hereinafter referred to as “suspect C and “F”), text messages, investigation reports (assigning ethyl content and purchaser, B and C), investigation reports (the response to the details of medical care benefits of the National Health Insurance Corporation), and investigation reports (the response to the details of medical care benefits of the National Health Insurance Corporation);
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to account statements, such as response to concentration, cooperation, opinion, prescription, etc.;
1. Selection of each of Articles 61 (1) 5, 4 (1) 2, and 2 subparagraph 3 (d) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. under the relevant Acts on criminal facts, and the selection of imprisonment with prison labor;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;
1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;
1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are the first offense with no record of criminal punishment, recognizing a mistake by the Defendant.
The Defendant committed the instant crime upon the Defendant’s request, but C and D, upon the Defendant’s request, were provided with false ethyl oxides in a mental department, and the Defendant delivered B with ethyl oxide 174.