1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim extended in the trial is dismissed.

3...

1. The fact that the Plaintiff remitted a total of KRW 5,1480,000 from December 4, 2012 to November 2, 2013, to the Defendant’s account at the time of the teaching system, as indicated in the following table, that the Plaintiff wired a total of KRW 5,1480,00 as indicated in the following table, is not disputed by the parties, or is recognized if the purport of the entire pleadings is added to the written evidence No.

. On December 12, 2012. 100,000 Korean Bank on December 4, 2012. 12. “10,000,000” on December 16, 2012. “1,00,000,000; 30.30.30.30,000,000 on December 30, 2012 (“50,000,0000; 13.0.0,000,000 on January 16, 2013 (“50,000,000,000,000 on April 18, 2013; 20.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) as to the Plaintiff’s claim is that the Plaintiff remitted KRW 30 million to the Defendant’s bank account from May 4, 2012 to October 22, 2013, including remitting KRW 150,000,00 from May 10, 2013 and KRW 1.5 million to May 13, 2013, the Plaintiff leased KRW 21,1480,00 to the Defendant. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 31,480,00 and its delay damages. (2) The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff transferred KRW 31,48,00 to the Defendant’s bank account from around December 4, 2012 to around October 22, 2013 is without merit, and there is no further evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff’s assertion was made with KRW 1.35,51,000,00 of the total amount of money transferred to the Defendant’s account.

(b).