beta
Text
1. The defendant,
A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 85,831,641 and its related KRW 5% per annum from April 21, 2017 to September 19, 2018.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Plaintiff A was enrolled in H High School around 2016, and Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff D’s grandparents, Plaintiff E and F’s grandparents, Plaintiff A’s appearance, Plaintiff A’s appearance, and the Defendant is a school safety mutual aid business entity established pursuant to the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for School Safety Accidents (hereinafter “School Safety Act”).
B. On July 6, 2016, Plaintiff A was involved in an accident that knee knee fels on the left-hand side at school sports hours (hereinafter “instant accident”). As a result, Plaintiff A received medical treatment, such as being treated as a knee kne fe kne knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee s
C. On January 18, 2017, Plaintiff A was diagnosed as having received a diagnosis that “it was performed surgery medical care due to the heat on the part of the sliffe in the sliffe on the part of the sliffe in the direction, but there was a 7m of strefe in comparison with the case of the shots test, and there was a physical disability due to the East Tiffe, which frequently requires the installation of a fixed gear on the left part,” and on September 18, 2017, J Hospital was diagnosed as having a permanent disability corresponding to class 12 of Table 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the State Compensation Act because there was a difference of 6.41m from both sides on both sides.
On April 6, 2017, Plaintiff C, the legal representative of Plaintiff A, filed a claim for mutual aid benefits with the Defendant on the basis of the diagnosis of post-treatment disability as above.
The Defendant paid the Plaintiff C benefits equivalent to the hospital treatment costs, but rejected the payment of disability benefits on June 27, 2017.
E. As a result of this court’s physical examination of Plaintiff A, the left-hand sleep stress training opinion was observed in the ethic examination of Plaintiff A, and the opinion on the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic e.g.