A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No person who receives personal information from a personal information manager shall use the personal information for any purpose other than the intended purpose.

Defendant’s Government Time

B. In the name of “D” in subparagraph C, a person who conducts an election campaign against the F’s “F” improvement project for “D” in the name of “D,” and the victim G is the head of the association promoting the said improvement

On April 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) requested a copy of the list and telephone number excluding the number of union members; and (b) prepared and sent a certificate of intent to use it for the purpose of filing a criminal complaint against breach of trust to the judicial authority in cases where the victims, the president of the E Housing Redevelopment Development and Improvement Project, who were the president of the partnership, voluntarily selected the subcontractor and caused unfair damage to union members; and (c) received the list of union members on May 23, 2017, stating the names and telephone numbers of union members.

However, the Defendant did not use the above personal information for the purpose of filing a criminal complaint against breach of trust, and used personal information for any purpose other than the intended purpose of receiving it by preparing a notice stating the purport that the E redevelopment project will cause enormous damages to its members, around June 2017, around October 2017, and around December 5, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement of H;

1. A certificate of contents (request for disclosure of information), information disclosure, a written confirmation of receipt of the information disclosure document, and a letter;

1. A notice (No. 3, No. 10), a notice (No. 3, No. 11), a supplementary explanation, a notice (No. 3), a notice (No. 3), and a non-Subrogation text (No. 54, 56, 63, and 66). The Defendant already secured the list of union members before the instant case, and the list of union members was not necessarily required for sending a notice, etc. to union members. Accordingly, around May 23, 2017.