logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.05.25 2015가단527569
양수금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased I, the defendant A 2,170,310 won, and the defendant B 1,46.

Reasons

According to the purport of the evidence Nos. 1 through 10 and the entire arguments, the deceased I and the deceasedJ, as shown in the grounds for the appeal, are obligated to pay the principal and interest of loan under a loan transaction agreement to the plaintiff. The defendants are obligated to pay the plaintiff the principal and interest of loan inherited according to their respective inheritance shares as successors.

Although Defendant E, F, and G asserted that the extinctive prescription has expired, according to the evidence Nos. 9 and 10, it is recognized that the Plaintiff completed the registration of provisional attachment on the ground of the decision of the court of full Gun branch of the Gwangju District Court on August 8, 1997 (97Kadan324) of the provisional attachment (97Kadan324), the extinctive prescription has not expired.

According to evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, D, E, F, and G’s inheritance limited approval report, the above Defendants are obligated to perform their respective obligations within the scope of property inherited from the deceased I and J.

arrow