1. The part of the lower judgment against Defendant A, C, and D shall be reversed.

Defendant

A, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the court below sentenced 30 million won to Defendant A, C, and D, and sentenced 1 year of imprisonment to Defendant B. The prosecutor asserts that both the punishment of Defendant A, C, and D is too unfasible and unfair. The prosecutor asserts that all of the punishment of Defendant A, C, and D is too unfasible, and that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. We examine both the Defendants A, C, and D’ and the Defendants’ assertion of unreasonable sentencing.

Defendant

A is the primary offender and two children, and there is no economic condition that A is the most economically. Defendant C also leads to the birth of a woman as the primary offender, Defendant D has no record of punishment for a crime related to a game room, and all the above Defendants are in a profoundly against the wrongness.

그러나 불법게임장 운영 관련 범죄는 일반 대중의 사행심을 조장하고 가정경제를 파탄시키는 등 그 사회적 해악이 매우 커 이를 엄하게 처벌할 필요성이 있는 점, 이 사건 게임장 영업과 관련하여 경찰 단속을 피하기 위하여 일명 ‘깜깜이’ 차량을 동원하는 등 그 범행수법이 치밀하고 조직적으로 역할을 분담한 것을 감안할 때 죄질이 가볍지 않은 점, 따라서 위 피고인들에 대해 진지한 반성의 촉구 및 재범 방지 차원에서 따끔한 경고가 필요한 점 등의 사정을 종합하면, 원심이 선고한 벌금형은 너무 가벼워 보인다.

B. The above defendant B’s above part can be considered favorably with the fact that the above defendant’s health is not good due to beer and beer.

However, as seen earlier, the crime of this case is not less weak and the defendant committed another identical crime despite the fact that he was punished for the crime related to the game room, and most of all, according to the mobile analysis report and video CD reproduction result duly adopted and investigated in the trial, the above defendant is involved in the acceptance of the game machine.