1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Punishment of the crime

On March 18, 2015, around 07:38, the Defendant, at the parking lot prior to the funeral hall of the D Hospital located in C when permanent residence at around 07:38, became the victim E (the age of 48) and Sifab, and carried fab, and moved to the place of the instant hospital’s rehabilitation and treatment room in front of the hospital’s care room. The victim became the Defendant.

At this time, the Defendant, while stating that “Isn't her own “Isn't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl'

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement prepared by the F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Consideration of favorable circumstances, etc. among the reasons for sentencing below);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( considered as favorable circumstances, etc. among the reasons for sentencing following the suspended sentence);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months to fifteen years;

2. Sentencing criteria [Scope of Recommendation] Type 1 (Habitual Injury, Bodi Bodily Injury, Bodily Injury and Special Bodily Injury) (No person who has been specially punished) basic area (two to four years).

3. The instant crime of this case, which was sentenced, was committed by using a dangerous news block, and the method was very dangerous, and the Defendant did not agree with the victim.

However, the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case in a contingent manner, and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime recently.

In addition, the defendant deposited some amount for the victim, and shows a attitude against his fault in this court.