The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (two months of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant confessions the instant crime and reflects it is favorable for him.

However, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and requires a simple and severe punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, and the defendant has been sentenced to fines or suspended execution several times for the same crime, and the defendant committed the instant crime again without being able to do so during the suspended execution period, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, happiness environment, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., are considered as being too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.