1. The Defendant’s KRW 90,097,978 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from December 3, 2014 to December 9, 2015, and the following.

Basic Facts

The defendant is a school juristic person established to maintain, manage, and operate the National Foundation, etc., and is an affiliated institution of the National Foundation of the National Foundation of the National Foundation of the Future Knowledge Education Education Center (the name of February 2009 is changed from the Lifelong Education Institute).

Around February 2009, the said Future Knowledge Education Center established in the course of Lebts’ riding, and entered into an agency contract with C that operates B for the horse riding education project. The main contents thereof are that the Defendant permitted C to use the name of the “Building Future Knowledge Education Center for the Future Knowledge of the National University” and provided the space of lecture free of charge, and C performs the recruitment of students and continuous follow-up management by using the name of the “National University Future Knowledge Education Center for the National University.”

On March 2009, the Plaintiff, a Korean national residing in Japan, was registered in the course of 2009 at the Han National University Future Knowledge Education Center for the first semester 1, 2009, and was engaged in a horse riding course on April 28, 2009, where six students were enrolled in the horse riding course located in Hanam-si, Hanam-si, and where one of them was engaged in a horse riding course, the Plaintiff she sawd one of them into a horse riding course, and thereby suffered a pressure from the pressure of 6rd by the end of the Plaintiff’s riding.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). 【The ground for recognition” has no dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 2 through 4, 7, 14, and 15 (including each number), Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the court’s physical appraisal reply to the president of the Central University Hospital. As a result, the Plaintiff’s horse riding teaching as a whole is highly likely to lead to a large amount of injury at the time of abortion, the Defendant should fully prepare a stability gear and restrict the number of horse horses to conduct horse riding education so that the horses do not engage in any abnormal behavior, and if the safety personnel need to stay at the site in preparation for the situation, the Plaintiff’s horse riding education is safe, such as failing to take such measures.