logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.03.10 2015고단3973
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. No person who outlines the facts charged shall conceal any false fact openly through an information and communications network with intent to defame another person, thereby impairing the honor of another person;

In around 2013, the Defendant, a website, called “Welp” (htp:/www. Shebe.com) and “C”, was a person who took part in the “htp” and “http”, and the victim D took a speech to defend E in relation to the issues of military service of the children, and had the victim expressed a false statement that he received money from E on the said website to defame the victim.

A. On September 23, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) at the Defendant’s father’s mother house located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F on September 23, 2015, and connected the said “C” on the political bulletin board of the said “daily Vietnam repository” and received support of KRW 450 million from the E side for the purpose of slandering the victim under the title of “G”.

(b) a tool that sees D with a voice far away from TV to E, with a view to 4,50,000,000 won as E-defensed; or

I would like to do.

(hereinafter referred to as “the omission”) posted a false letter.”

However, there was no fact that the victim or the victim had received money from E.

Accordingly, with the aim of slandering the victim, the Defendant posted a false fact openly through the information and communication network, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim.

B. On September 25, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around September 10:09 around September 25, 2015, and the Defendant’s writing posted as stated in paragraph (1) was deleted upon receipt of a report from the injured party, which was then connected to the “C” on the said “I.” political bulletin board for the purpose of slandering the injured party.

arrow