The sentence of each sentence shall be suspended against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A found the Defendant guilty of a sexual crime of “E” on the Internet daily database website (htp:/www. /www.com) and on July 10, 2015, around 11:34, the Defendant disclosed the disclosed information of an artist G, which was disclosed by posting it on the Internet daily bulletin storage site, by posting it on the Internet daily newspaper, for a sexual crime of “the present real-time G location” by accessing the aforementioned website by using a computer used by himself/herself in Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 102-902-dong 102-dong 902.

2. On July 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was found guilty of a sexual crime of “G protocol” using a smartphone (J) that he/she used in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Seoul to access the said website; and (b) disclosed personal information by posting the disclosed information of the publicly disclosed artist on the website of the Internet (information and communications network) for a daily newspaper by posting the disclosed information of the publicly disclosed artist on the information and communications network.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to K in the police statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on disclosed information of entertainers G posted on the Internet-related storage site for the Internet day;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: The Defendants’ choice of fines under Articles 65(1)2 and 55(2)1 of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from Sexual Abuse;

1. Defendants to be suspended from sentence: 1,000,000 won by fine; and

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day);

1. The Defendants of suspended sentence: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act provides that the Defendants may take into account the circumstances leading up to the commission of the crimes, and immediately delete the Defendants, recognizing that the Defendants were erroneous acts immediately after the posting of the instant notice, and reflects depth, and have no record of being punished for crimes, etc.)