A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Seized evidence Nos. 1 through 4 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall arrange, solicit, induce or coerce sexual traffic for business purposes, or provide a place for sexual traffic.

Defendant 1 operated commercial sex acts in the name of "E" in the name of "E" located in the Dong-dong building 603, and around March 3, 2016, Defendant 2 installed 8 rooms in the room and employed women F and women engaged in commercial sex acts (G and Chinese people) to have sexual intercourse with male customers, and paid 60,000 won among them to sexual sex acts women by receiving 130,000 won as the price for commercial sex acts from sexual buyers.

Accordingly, on March 23, 2016, the Defendant received 130,000 won from a police officer controlling around 20:10,000 won as the price for sexual traffic and gave guidance to sexual intercourse with the above G.

Accordingly, the Defendant, from March 3, 2016 to March 23, 2016, committed acts such as arranging sexual traffic by providing a place for sexual traffic for business purposes from around March 3, 2016, and thereby, gained money and valuables of KRW 700,000 as the price for sexual traffic from male customers who are not named.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police in relation to F and G;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act (generally, selection of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. The reasons for sentencing under the first sentence of Article 25 (No. 4) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 48 (1) (No. 1) of the Criminal Act (No. 3) of the Criminal Act have the career of having been punished three times (one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment and two times of fine) for the same crime from 2008.

In particular, on July 13, 2015, the Defendant was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime in this court, and again committed the instant crime at the same place.

The sentence on the accused is inevitable.

However, the fact that the defendant is seriously against the defendant, and the period of the crime is not relatively long, and the criminal proceeds are not much much.