logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.05 2015고단5265
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

[Defendant A] Article 1-1(b) of the judgment of the Defendant, and Article 1-1(b) of the judgment, shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for each crime.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On November 8, 2013, A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of collective, deadly weapons, etc.) in the vice branch of the Incheon District Court on November 8, 2013, and three years of suspension of execution was decided on November 16, 2013.

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant, along with the female who is “E” where the identity of the Defendant is unknown from March 2013 to June 2013, at the business trip establishment of “G” located in the east of Japan from around 2013 to around 2013, he received the phone of Japanese male customers who contacted through the above G’s Internet website and magazines advertisements, etc., and the Defendant hired Korean sexual traffic women who directly contact the Defendant by reporting the introduction of sexual traffic brokers or Internet job placement advertisements in the Republic of Korea, and led them to the said G’s neighboring accommodation and waiting in the said G’s neighboring accommodation, and arranged them to perform sexual intercourse or similarity by receiving 20,000 UN or 30,000 from the male customers who promised to contact with the said female by telephone during the time.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with the above E to arrange commercial sex acts.

B. On August 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) provided an explanation on the commercial sex acts conducted in Japan at a coffee shop, where the trade name in the middle-dong of Hacheon-si is unknown; (b) provided an explanation on the commercial sex acts conducted in Japan; and (c) provided an explanation on the commercial sex acts conducted in Japan, around August 31, 2013, the Defendant introduced H to the J, the owner of a commercial sex business establishment, “I,” which is called “I,” where the commercial sex acts are arranged after leaving Japan.

As a result, the defendant introduced an occupation to sell sex to the above H with knowledge that the above I business owner is acting as a broker for sexual traffic.

(2) On October 2013, the Defendant, along with K, is made in Japan and L and M at a coffee shop where it is impossible to find out the trade name in the Hacheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, the Defendant, along with K, a broker for sexual traffic.

arrow