logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2015.04.21 2014가단33000
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant should pay the Plaintiff the construction cost of KRW 24,56,300 and the delay damages therefor, as the Plaintiff entered into an oral contract with the Defendant for the construction work of the new construction work of the land convenience facility of Pyeongtaek-si B (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).

As to whether the Plaintiff entered into the instant construction contract with the Defendant, it is not sufficient to recognize only the images of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the images of Gap evidence Nos. 3, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge them.

Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion premised on the conclusion of the instant construction contract with the Defendant is without merit without examining the remainder of the construction cost.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow