logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.07.11 2016가단30156
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On August 6, 2015, the Plaintiff concluded a construction contract with the Defendant to perform the construction work of Chang-ho and glass (fire doors, visits, hardware, etc.) (hereinafter “instant construction work”) among the new construction works of the instant building owned by the Defendant, by oral with the Defendant, at KRW 23,721,50 (including value-added tax). As the Plaintiff completed the instant construction work, the Defendant asserts that he/she is a party to the instant construction contract and a contractor for the instant construction work, and is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the construction cost.

The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction works of this case with the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow