The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (a factual error) is limited to the claim that the knife is “I knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the fact that the Defendant threatened the victim can be fully acknowledged.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

1) At an investigative agency, the victim saw the male procedure as a beauty room that is not in mind by the defendant, and asked the defendant to return the male procedure and demanded the return of the male procedure and interfered with the business, and did not refund the male in the account number known by the defendant. Accordingly, the defendant did not refund the male on the account number notified by the defendant. The defendant re-exploe the male and desire to return the male and sound the male as "the male shall do with the male" while going to the victim about the male at the distance of the male to the degree of contact. The victim stated that the victim "the male is dead" was "the death of the bale", and the defendant made a statement that "the male is dead" and "the male is not dead" (29-32 pages).2) At the time when he was witness E.

(3) In light of the statements made by the victim and witness E, rather than having tried to make a refund, the Defendant seems to have discussed: (a) the Defendant, who requested a refund, by making the victim’s remarks excessively; and (b) the Defendant’s remarks toward knife and knife knife knife knife knife and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.