logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.08.30 2016고단673
건조물침입
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported that the first floor corridor of the 1st floor of, and entered into, a building C at Jinju-si, D (n, 22 years old); (b) went into, a female toilet; and (c) went into, a female toilet; and (d) went into, a female toilet;

On the other hand, the partitions turned off D with widths, and it intruded into female toilets, which are buildings managed by the name influences.

2. On February 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported on February 1, 2016, around Jinju-si, that the Defendant entered the first floor corridor of the E building in F (n, 22 years of age) and entered the said female toilet; (b) invaded into the said female toilet; and (c) had F

On the other hand, the partitions cut F with widths, and it intruded into female toilets, which are buildings managed by the name influences.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of theCC-TV photographic (hereinafter referred to as “CC-TV photographic”) at a damaged place, and of the Act and subordinate statutes of the Act and subordinate statutes of the 10th time;

1. Article 319 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 319 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Consideration of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) - Consideration of the absence of agreement with D, F and the victim

arrow